Counter-terrorism and insurgency response
Whole chapter · 18–27 focused hours
Counter-terrorism and insurgency response
General-studies learner with basic Indian constitutional institutions and the Science computing/network foundation; no policing or technical security background assumed.
Includes
- Assigned sections and concise recall notes
- Available mapped practice and analysis of mistakes
- One initial closed-book review
Separate time needed
- Later revision and full mock tests
- Continuing current-affairs updates
- Technical security operations or legal-professional training
- Foundational constitutional and network material budgeted in other subjects
Editorial planning estimate; not learner timing data
- External actors and domestic support networks
- Prevention and recovery
- International counter-terrorism cooperation
- Organised crime and terrorism
- Selected UAPA powers and safeguards
Whole chapter reading
- Ministry of Home Affairs Annual Report 2024–2025 ↗
Paragraphs 2.3–2.7, printed pages 6–7, PDF pages 12–13; functions rather than organisation counts
- Ministry of Home Affairs Annual Report 2024–2025 ↗
Paragraph 2.42, PDF pages 23–24, and paragraphs 2.43(e)–(f), 2.44 opening and vocational-training provision, PDF pages 24–25; dialogue, suspension arrangements and rehabilitation; exclude current AFSPA notifications, bans, deployments, payment rates and claimed outcomes
- PRAHAAR: India’s National Counter-Terrorism Policy and Strategy ↗
Introduction and Threat Profile, PDF pages 3–4; sections 1–3, 5–7 and The Way Forward, PDF pages 5–9. Read threat mechanisms, prevention, coordination, cooperation and recovery. Exclude tactical details, blanket effectiveness claims, section 4 UDHR-signatory wording and section 5 implication that radicalisation alone determines criminal liability.
- The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 ↗
Sections 3–5, 15, 17, 35, 36(1)–(5), 37–39, 43B(1), 45(2), PDF pages 8–9, 13–14, 19–21, 23 and 25; text as on 22 August 2025. Selected statutory powers, intent and safeguards; exclude malformed section 36(6), obsolete procedural-code cross-references and a complete account of bail or constitutional jurisprudence.
- Theoretical frameworks on crime–terrorism linkages ↗
Williams, Makarenko and Shelley models; analytical alternatives rather than a necessary sequence
- Crime–terrorism linkages: definitions and terminology ↗
Organized crime and concluding comparison: material benefit, political purpose and possible barriers to cooperation; exclude sanctions-list summary and serious-crime penalty paraphrase
- Terrorism and drug trafficking ↗
Khan Mohammed case study, opening paragraph: historical financing link only; exclude current custody status, detailed transaction narrative and dated production totals
- Terrorism and drug trafficking ↗
Examples Box: Cocaine and heroin trafficking, sentence on AQIM taxing trafficking across territory; historical mechanism, not a current territorial-control claim
- Terrorism and trafficking in weapons ↗
Key facts paragraph beginning The relationship and potential links; reminder that firearms trafficking is not necessarily organised crime. Exclude casualty counts, weapon preferences and forecasts.
- Trafficking in persons and terrorism ↗
Key facts final two paragraphs and Example Box first analytical paragraph: funding, fear and recruitment. Direct links with separate trafficking groups remain uncertain; exclude dated statistics and Yazidi case description.
- Kidnapping for ransom and terrorism ↗
Abu Sayyaf case study opening paragraph: historical financing and changing objectives; do not equate all hostage-taking with ransom kidnapping or treat historical totals as current.
- Smuggling of Arms and Narcotics: Lok Sabha question 1900 ↗
Lok Sabha answer 1900, 1 August 2023, PDF page 1, answer (a)–(c), first sentence: drone transport of arms/narcotics; exclude recovery count and inference of current scale